Read the news release about the 2020 awards >

Sustained Excellence Awards

Claremont McKenna College

Dartmouth College

Davidson College

Delta College

George Mason University

Harvard University

Phillips Exeter Academy

Thacher School

The Madeira School

University of California, Berkeley

University of California, Santa Barbara Foundation

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

University of Texas at Austin

University of Virginia

Walla Walla University

Woodberry Forest School

First-time Winners

Air Force Academy Foundation

California State University, East Bay

Central Michigan University

Colby-Sawyer College

Concordia College

Drury University

Genesee Community College

Geneva College

Hamline University

Honolulu Community College 

Hood College

Ithaca College

Jefferson Community and Technical College

Kapiolani Community College

Lewis & Clark College

Maryville College

Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts

North Shore Community College

Norwich University

Nova Southeastern University 

Rice University

Rockhurst University

San Francisco State University

Shenandoah University

Southwest Minnesota State University

Trinity Valley Community College

Tulsa Community College

University of Delaware

University of Mount Union

University of Utah

William Jewell College 

From the Judges (Higher Education)

When reviewing the data from the CASE VSE Survey, we look for much more than the total amount of funds raised. Breadth and depth matters. We also look for institutions that “punch above their weight”--institutions that rank lower in their categories like budgets and enrollment, but who rank higher in terms of funds raised in various categories, such as funds raised per FTE enrollment.

We were delighted to see a growing number of institutions across all higher education sectors being recognized for the first time this year.  To us, that speaks to additional support for advancement at institutions, along with the recognition that development can help to address pressing revenue needs.  Recipients came from across the United States, with the West Coast continuing to impress for the sheer number of recipients across the board.

Among the trends we noticed in this year’s judging was an increase in support from donor advised funds. While this has been a trend for several years now, this year's numbers were particularly impressive. Most of the categories were extremely competitive. That was especially true in the community college sector, where the number of institutions that made the preliminary cut was high enough that we divided the group into two categories for the first time ever.

We also noted that alumni participation, with a few notable exceptions, continues to decline, yet the amount of money given by alumni continues to increase. This trend has held steady for the last several years, leading us to believe it is time to revisit how much weight we give to alumni participation in determining high-performing programs. 

Finally, the numbers across all sectors were very strong this year, leaving us to ponder how significantly the impact of COVID-19 will curb such great momentum.  

From the Judges (Independent Schools)

As we look back to school year 2019-2020, the importance of philanthropy for the financial sustainability of our schools was for the most part dependent on highly productive and efficient advancement programs. Fundraising success is measured by many variables, not only by which schools raise the most money. Today, as we are recognizing those schools who have evidenced exceptional advancement programs, we are reminded of the importance of the community that supports our schools.

The CASE Voluntary Support of Education survey provides many different data points for measuring a school’s fundraising program over a three-year period.  Thank you to all of the schools that submit data, providing useful comparisons for improving all independent school development programs.

Again, this year we recognize schools that showed not just measurable growth in dollars raised, but also breadth and depth in terms of diversity of sources from which funds were raised. Among the many variables, we looked carefully at results on a per-student basis. Each cohort (by endowment size) was very competitive.

Among the trends we noticed in this year’s judging was a general increase in gifts for current operations and gifts for endowment from parents and alumni across all categories. We also noted that alumni participation and the number of alumni donors continues to decline, although the amount of money given by alumni continues to increase. This trend has held steady for the last several years, and requires examination.

In showcasing these best-of-the-best programs, CASE helps its members identify schools that excel in their outcomes, and do so efficiently so that we can all learn from their best practices. We encourage and highly recommend that you submit your own school’s information next year and spend some time in the CASE VSE Data Miner to dive into details about what makes these programs worthy of recognition. As we move forward and hopefully through this pandemic with the attention needed to create more equitable communities, we should turn to each other more often for sharing ideas and new practices.

About the Awards