THIS SAMPLE REPORT USES SIMULATED DATA FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES
The Summary Benchmarking Reports are institutional benchmarking reports from CASE Insights which provide a complimentary overview of your institution’s responses to the surveyand key comparison groups. These reports are a great launching point for using comparison benchmarks and can provide direction for further strategy or analysis.
CASE Insights’ Strategic Benchmarking Reports dive deeper into each institutions’ data by comparing your institution to 10 peers of your choosing on over 25 calculated metrics. Please contact CASE Insights Solutions for more information.
On behalf of the whole CASE Insights team, thank you for your survey participation!
Fiscal year 2024 was a healthy year for Your Institution. Explore the
sections below to understand how you can translate pipeline successes
into further increase. Consider partnering with CASE Insights Solutions
for an in-depth walk through of your results, to learn how CASE data can
fit your needs, and identify strategic opportunities.
Non-Alumni were your lowest source of support in 2024. Hover over the
chart to explore revenue by source for Your Institution, your CASE
peers, and all survey respondents. Use the buttons below to change the
display of information from dollars to percentage of total Funds
Received.
Alumni are a key constituency group. The charts below will help you
benchmark alumni donors at your institution to understand what
percentage of your contactable and solicited alumni are engaging with
Your Institution as donors. To identify how many alumni were solicited
for your benchmarking groups, please see the Data tab at the
top of this report. The CASE Insights on Alumni Engagement survey can help
you further understand alumni behavior for your institution and how
non-philanthropically engaged alumni can improve your alumni giving
pipeline.
| CASE Peers |
|---|
| Peer 1 |
| Peer 2 |
| Peer 3 |
| Peer 4 |
| Peer 5 |
| Peer 6 |
| Peer 7 |
| Peer 8 |
| Peer 9 |
| Peer 10 |
CASE Peers and All Respondents results are presented as median figures in this presentation. Read below to learn more about how your CASE Peers were selected.
Your institution was classified as a part of the cluster group using Latent Class Analysis.
Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was first conducted in 2013 on data from the CASE-Ross surveys in 2011–12 to explore the possibility of uncovering groups of institutions that had similar fundraising profiles and has been repeated every year. LCA was used to group institutions into different clusters based on certain defining variables that provided the most information about key characteristics of fundraising activities and for which there was sufficient variation between institutions to offer distinct patterns and differentiating factors. These variables are:
Average figures for these variables across a three-year period were used to ensure that comparisons were based on performance over time rather than any single year. In earlier years, a five-cluster solution offered a good statistical fit for the data and made substantive sense. However, since 2015–16, additional analysis on the Emerging cluster was conducted. It was found that the institutions in this cluster could be further divided into two sub-clusters producing a total of six clusters (Elite, Established, Moderate, Developing, Emerging, and Fragile) in recent years.
The above process was first applied to the dataset using Latent GOLD® v6.0 software. However, this did not yield clear clusters. Further analysis showed that the best fit was a five-cluster solution in which the largest cluster was then divided into two clusters to yield the Developing and another larger cluster which then divided naturally into a group of 19 Emerging, and 11 Fragile institutions.
The first CASE-Ross Group Support of Education Survey was carried out in 2002 (for 2001-02 data) and built on previous surveys undertaken within the Ross Group; the survey has been repeated annually since then. Participation is open to all higher education institutions in United Kingdom and Ireland.
The survey collects detailed information about gift revenue, fundraising costs, and donors to measure the philanthropic performance of higher education institutions in the United Kingdom and Ireland. It provides an estimate of the overall impact of philanthropy on the higher education sector, is the only source of information on this subject in the United Kingdom and enables institutions to compare themselves with similar/peer institutions.
The survey asks for data on specific fundraising variables: fundraising and alumni relations programme (fundraising and alumni relations – staff, expenditure), funds received (total, by source, by contribution level, from legacies, largest cash gifts, from various triggers), donors (donor intentions, potential donors – total, individual, organisation, donor numbers – total, individual, organisations), institutional campaigns, and new funds committed (total, by source, by contribution level, largest confirmed new pledge or gift).
Commitments and Revenue
Sources of Support
If you wish to print this report, please note you may need to adjust your printer settings to achieve the desired layout of the printed document.
The charts in this report are interactive, allowing you to:
The Data table in this report is also interactive, allowing you to: