THIS SAMPLE REPORT USES SIMULATED DATA FOR DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES
An executive overview will be written by the CASE Insights team with the purchase of presentation calls. If your purchase includes calls, this section will be populated after your preview call with the CASE Insights team.
| VSE Peers |
|---|
| Sample Peer 1 |
| Sample Peer 2 |
| Sample Peer 3 |
| Sample Peer 4 |
| Sample Peer 5 |
| Sample Peer 6 |
| Sample Peer 7 |
| Sample Peer 8 |
| Sample Peer 9 |
| Sample Peer 10 |
| Sample Peer 11 |
| Sample Peer 12 |
| Sample Peer 13 |
| Sample Peer 14 |
| Sample Peer 15 |
| Sample Peer 16 |
CASE InsightsSM on Voluntary Support of Education
(formerly VSE) is the authoritative source of data on giving to higher
education institutions in the US with 64 years of rigorous survey data.
Nearly 1,000 institutions respond each year. The 2024 survey collected
data for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024
(with a few institutions reporting on different fiscal calendars). Data
shown are cash received, not pledges or commitments. Access the Guidance Document for specific inclusions
and exclusions across the survey.
The table below tracks reported silent or public phases of a comprehensive campaign by year. If an institution did not answer this question, their status will not populate for this table.
| Institution | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Institution | Campaign | Campaign | ||||||||
| Sample Peer 1 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 2 | Campaign | |||||||||
| Sample Peer 3 | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | |||||||
| Sample Peer 4 | Campaign | |||||||||
| Sample Peer 5 | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | ||||
| Sample Peer 6 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 7 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 8 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 9 | Campaign | Campaign | ||||||||
| Sample Peer 10 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 11 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 12 | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | ||||
| Sample Peer 13 | Campaign | Campaign | ||||||||
| Sample Peer 14 | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | |||||||
| Sample Peer 15 | ||||||||||
| Sample Peer 16 | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign | Campaign |
This view shows Funds Received over a 10-year period. Between 2015 and 2024, your institution decreased by -$6,291,689.
This view ranks Funds Received among Peers. Over the last 10 years, Sample Institution moved down 8 position(s) among peers. Your highest ranked year was 2015 and your lowest ranked year was 2021.
Funds Received includes:
Funds Received per FTE provides a lens for benchmarking based on
current enrollment. This view ranks Total Support per FTE among Peers.
In this analysis, Sample Institution’s highest ranked year was
2015 and Sample Institution’s lowest ranked year was
2023.
In 2024, Sample Institution moved up 1
spot(s) from the previous year.
2024 gift income from Funds Received for Sample Institution was -27.5% lower than 2015 Funds Received.
The data below shows this information as a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), which calculates the average annual percentage growth over time, smoothing out atypical growth or loss during the period. Cumulative growth is calculated for your institution and your Peers as the percentage change each year relative to 2015, the first year Sample Institution submitted data in any year after 2015.
Between 2015 and 2024, Sample Institution had a CAGR of -3.5%. For comparison, Peers that participated in the VSE survey in 2015 and 2024 had a CAGR of 1.9%.
In 2024, 33.3% of Funds Received came from the three largest gifts from Bequests, three largest gifts from Corporations, three largest gifts from Foundations, and three largest gifts from Individuals. Please note that largest gifts from Donor-Advised Funds (collection beginning in 2022) and Other Organizations are not displayed in the data below.
Sample Institution increased gift income by 30% between 2023
and 2024, from $12,803,633 to $16,581,355. For comparison,
56.2% of Peers and 54.5% of All Respondents had positive change in gift
income between 2023 and 2024.
These charts show trends excluding the three largest gifts from bequests, individuals, corporations, foundations, or donor-advised funds. This view helps to exclude large gift outliers, however outliers may still be present if the largest gifts came from Other Organizations.
In the charts below, Sample Institution increased gift income
minus the three largest gifts by 16% between 2023 and 2024,
from $11,377,337 to $13,235,345. For comparison, 56.2% of Peers and
55.3% of All Respondents had positive change in gift income minus the
three largest gifts between 2023 and 2024.
Growth is calculated for your institution, your Peers, and All Respondents as the percentage change each year relative to 2015, the first year Sample Institution submitted data in any year after 2015. In the chart below, Sample Institution decreased gift income by -28% between 2015 and 2024.
This chart shows trends excluding the three largest gifts from bequests, individuals, corporations, foundations, or donor-advised funds. This view helps to exclude large gift outliers, however outliers may still be present if the largest gifts came from Other Organizations.
Growth is calculated for your institution, your Peers, and All Respondents as the percentage change each year relative to 2015, the first year Sample Institution submitted data in any year after 2015. In the chart below, Sample Institution decreased gift income minus the three largest gifts by -12% between 2015 and 2024.
This was an optional survey question. This was a new question in 2022.
This was an optional survey question. Only
institutions which responded to this question in both 2023 and 2024 are
displayed below.
In 2024, 34% of Sample Institution’s gift income came from the three largest gifts from each source: Individuals, Bequests, (for 2022+) Donor Advised Funds, Foundations, and Corporations. For comparison, 34% of your Self-Selected Peer’s and 26% of All Respondents’ gift income came from the fifteen largest gifts in 2024. Major gifts are a large portion of your overall support. Pay careful attention to giving bands to ensure enough donors are continuing to upgrade into mid and major giving levels.
Largest gifts refer to the accumulated totals for the year (including any newly established irrevocable deferred gifts - CRTs, CGAs, pooled income funds, or remainder interest in property at face value). So, if a donor writes multiple separate checks during the year, it is the sum of those gifts that should be used to determine if the donor is one of the three largest.
New Funds Committed was first asked in the survey in 2022 and first required as of the fiscal year 2023-24 reporting cycle. New Funds Committed includes New Pledges, Outright Gifts (not associated with a pledge), and New Revocable Bequest Intentions.
New Pledges were also required as of the fiscal year 2023-24 reporting cycle. Prior to FY24, this was an optional question. If an institution did not answer this question, their data will not populate for this answer.
Please note that support from Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs) was asked in the survey for the first time in the 2021-22 survey cycle. Prior to FY2022, DAFs were often included in Other Organizations by survey respondents but may be included in other source categories as well.
| Your Institution Change, 2023-2024 (%) | Peers Change, 2023-2024 (%) | All Respondents Change, 2023-2024 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alumni | 18.8% | 18.9% | 7.2% |
| Corporations | -23.4% | -12.8% | -8.1% |
| Donor-Advised Funds | -35.3% | 8.0% | 60.0% |
| Foundations | 54.7% | -29.7% | 4.7% |
| Non-Alumni | 87.2% | 26.6% | 11.4% |
| Other Organizations | 36.2% | 29.7% | 6.6% |
Please note the table above examines change in respondents who responded in both 2023 and 2024, and so may differ from the charts above.
In 2024, Sample Institution had 2,196 Alumni Donors. Your Peers had a median of 2,384 Alumni Donors, and All Respondents had a median of 1,699 Alumni Donors.
| Your Institution Change, 2023-2024 (%) | Peers Change, 2023-2024 (%) | All Respondents Change, 2023-2024 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alumni Donors | 8.4% | -2.1% | -4.2% |
Please note the table above examines change in respondents who responded in both 2023 and 2024, and so may differ from the charts above.
Revenue per Alumni Donor divides Funds Received from alumni by the number of alumni donors. It can provide you a measurement of how much revenue alumni, on average, are supporting your institution.
Family Foundations are those that have been established and continue to operate as the conduits for the charitable donations of an individual or immediate members of a family. This section uses data from the full version (as opposed to the minimal version) of the VSE and is an optional question. If an institution did not answer this question, their data will not populate for this answer.
| Your Institution Change, 2023-2024 (%) | Peers Change, 2023-2024 (%) | All Respondents Change, 2023-2024 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build/Equip/Prop | -22.7% | -17.5% | -4.9% |
| Current Ops (R) | 37.7% | 2.8% | 9.7% |
| Current Ops (U) | -34.7% | -3.6% | 3.0% |
| Deferred Gifts | -100.0% | n/a | n/a |
| Endowment (R) | 42.1% | -16.5% | -1.1% |
| Endowment (U) | n/a | -100.0% | 200.0% |
| Loan Funds | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Total | 28.8% | -2.4% | 8.3% |
Please note the table above examines change in respondents who responded in both 2023 and 2024, and so may differ from the charts above.
Restricted Gifts for Current Operations are outright gifts for current operations that the donor has restricted for use in a particular academic division of the institution - such as a College of Medicine, School of Law, or Department of English - but upon which no further restriction has been placed. Due to survey changes starting in 2022, restricted gifts for Other includes gifts for Library, Public Service, Operations and Maintenance of Plant, and Student Life.
This section uses data from the full version (as opposed to the minimal version) of the VSE and is an optional question. If an institution did not answer this question, their data will not populate for these charts. Your Self-Selected Peer Median for Income-Restricted gifts to Endowments may not match the Median shown for Philanthropic Support by Purpose, as this data may not contain results from all peers. Due to survey changes starting in 2022, restricted gifts for Other includes gifts for Library, Public Service, Operations and Maintenance of Plant, and Student Life.
Staffing counts below reflect the full time equivalents (FTEs) of paid staff by function. A single employee’s time may be spread over several functional areas. For example, if an institution has 4 full-time and 3 half-time staff working in a functional areas, their staff FTE is 5.50. The counts below do not include outside counsel or student workers, only staff who receive W-2s.
Expenditures reflect the total costs related to Salaries, Benefits, Current Operations Expenditures, and Capital Expenditures for each of the following categories: Development/Fundraising, Alumni Relations/Affairs, Advancement Services, Advancement Management.
This was an optional survey question. The following graph shows the scatter plot of New Funds Committed and Staff FTE. Each dot on the graph represents a single institution with different colors representing your institution, your peers, and all survey participants. Please use the drop-down menu to switch between development/fundraising staff or total staff.
The “Average Relationship” regression line quantifies the relationship between Staff FTEs and New Funds Committed for all survey participating institutions. If a dot is above the line, that means the institution has more staff than the regional average for that amount of New Funds Committed. Dots below the line, suggest the institution has less staff than the regional average for that amount of New Funds Committed.
Return on Investment (ROI) is a useful comparative metric which allows you to understand sustainability of investment as well as other factors such as risk, investment timeline, and external influence. ROI is calculated as: \({\text{New Funds Committed - Expenses}\over\text{Expenses}}\).
Please use the drop-down menu to switch between development/fundraising costs or total costs
While ROI focuses on the overall effectiveness of a fundraising campaign by comparing the revenue raised to the expenses incurred, while the cost to raise one dollar specifically measures how much it costs to obtain a single dollar in revenue. Cost to Raise One Dollar is calculated as: \({\text{Expenses}\over\text{New Funds Committed}}\).
Please use the drop-down menu to switch between development/fundraising costs or total costs